What happens when decent people become too afraid to confront bad people?
What happens when a community is forced to choose between law and fear?
And what happens when the law itself is no longer trusted to be the shield - but is instead experienced, rightly or wrongly, as another form of the whip?
These questions sit at the heart of a film I recently rewatched.
They also sit at the heart of every healthy democracy.
For years I believed The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance was simply a great Western. I remembered the gunfights, John Wayne’s swagger, James Stewart’s quiet decency, and Lee Marvin’s towering, terrifying performance as one of cinema’s great villains.
What I had forgotten - or perhaps never fully understood - was what the film is really about.
It is not truly a Western at all.
It is a story about civilisation itself.
The story begins when Senator Ransom Stoddard (James Stewart) returns to the small western town of Shinbone to attend the funeral of a little-regarded local man named Tom Doniphon (John Wayne). A curious reporter wants to know why a prominent Senator would travel so far to attend the funeral of a forgotten rancher.
The answer unfolds through a lengthy flashback.
Years earlier, Stoddard had arrived in the territory as a newly qualified lawyer, full of ideals and belief in the rule of law. On the journey west, his stagecoach is stopped by the notorious outlaw Liberty Valance (Lee Marvin) and his gang. Stoddard is robbed, beaten and horsewhipped within an inch of his life.
He survives only because the people of Shinbone take him in and care for him.
As he recovers, Stoddard begins teaching local children and adults to read and write. He teaches them about the law. He teaches them about their rights. He teaches them that education and self-government are pathways out of ignorance and fear.
At the same time, the territory is approaching a crucial decision. The people will soon vote on whether to remain a territory or seek statehood.
The railroad has arrived.
The frontier is changing.
The old ways are passing.
Liberty Valance represents the lawlessness of a dying age. He rules through intimidation and violence. He has no respect for the rights of others. His authority rests entirely on fear.
Stoddard represents something different.
He represents the idea that free people should govern themselves through law rather than force.
Tom Doniphon occupies the middle ground.
A practical man, Doniphon understands both worlds. He can see that change is inevitable. He knows the future belongs to law, education and democratic government, but he also understands something that Stoddard does not.
The law is not self-enforcing.
A law book sitting on a shelf cannot stop a bully.
A constitution cannot arrest a criminal.
A ballot paper cannot protect a frightened citizen standing alone.
For civilisation to survive, there must always be people prepared to defend it.
As the story unfolds, Liberty Valance and his gang terrorise the town. A weak Marshal is afraid to confront them. A newspaper editor fears having his office burned down. Ordinary citizens are intimidated into silence.
Many know what is right.
Few possess the courage to act.
The climax comes when Stoddard decides to confront Valance in a gunfight.
It is an act of desperation.
Valance is a hardened gunman. Stoddard is a lawyer.
No one expects the outcome that follows.
The two men face each other in the street. Valance fires first. Somehow Stoddard returns fire and Valance falls dead.
The town erupts in celebration.
Ransom Stoddard becomes a hero.
His reputation grows.
Eventually he becomes a Senator, a Governor and one of the most respected public figures in the territory.
He becomes famous as the man who shot Liberty Valance.
Yet the audience later learns the truth.
Stoddard did not kill Valance.
Tom Doniphon did.
Hidden in the shadows and armed with a rifle, Doniphon fired the fatal shot as Valance attempted to murder Stoddard.
Assisting him was his trusted friend and farmhand, Pompey.
The act is not murder.
Valance had already fired first. He was attempting to kill Stoddard. Doniphon's intervention was an act of defence of another.
Without Doniphon, Stoddard would have died in the street that night.
Without Stoddard, however, the territory might never have moved beyond the rule of fear.
That is the genius of the story.
Neither man alone is enough.
Without Ransom Stoddard, the people of Shinbone would never have found the knowledge or confidence to govern themselves.
Without Tom Doniphon, Ransom Stoddard would never have lived long enough to make that possible.
One provided the vision.
The other provided the resolve.
Together, they made civilisation possible.
That lesson feels remarkably relevant today.
Across Australia, America and much of the Western world, many people are increasingly concerned about crime, disorder, intimidation and the apparent reluctance of authorities to confront obvious problems.
The details differ from place to place.
The underlying concern is often the same.
People want safe streets.
They want functioning institutions.
They want laws that are enforced fairly and consistently.
They want confidence that those who prey upon others will face consequences for their actions.
Every generation produces its own Liberty Valances.
The faces change.
The methods change.
The names change.
But the principle remains the same.
There will always be individuals and groups who seek power through intimidation, violence, criminality and fear.
What defeats them is not wishful thinking.
What defeats them is resolve.
The teacher who refuses to stop teaching.
The journalist who refuses to stop reporting.
The police officer who refuses to surrender the streets.
The judge who applies the law without fear or favour.
The citizen who refuses to be bullied into silence.
These are the people who stand between civilisation and barbarism.
The answer to lawlessness is not vigilantism.
Nor is it surrender.
The answer is the vigorous and unapologetic enforcement of the law.
Fairly.
Consistently.
Without fear and without favour.
That, ultimately, is the true message of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.
It is not a story about gunfighters.
It is a story about civilisation.
It is a story about ordinary people finding the courage to reject fear as a way of life.
It is a story about education, citizenship, responsibility and the rule of law.
Most of all, it is a reminder that freedom is never self-sustaining.
Each generation must choose whether it will defend it.
The people of Shinbone made their choice.
Sooner or later, every society must make its own.
Because when decent people lose the courage to defend civilisation, Liberty Valance always rides back into town.
BLOG COMMENTS POWERED BY DISQUS
